<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Xelerated Xpress &#187; 4G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xelerated.com/tag/4g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xelerated.com</link>
	<description>Insight on Carrier Ethernet and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4G Or Not 4G, That Is The Question</title>
		<link>http://blog.xelerated.com/2010/01/08/4g-or-not-4g-that-is-the-question/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.xelerated.com/2010/01/08/4g-or-not-4g-that-is-the-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Per Lembre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Backhaul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xelerated.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ericsson&#8217;s and TeliaSonera&#8217;s announcement of the first commercial LTE deployment provoked an intensive debate on LinkedIn&#8217;s LTE group. Is LTE really 4G, or is it 3.9 or even 3.8? Few things triggers more discussion than terms and definition. On one hand, you have a group of professionals that believe that the usage of a term [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ericsson&#8217;s and TeliaSonera&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-worlds-first-4glte-network-goes-live-today-stockholm-/2009/12/14/4529909.htm">announcement</a> of the first commercial LTE deployment provoked an intensive debate on LinkedIn&#8217;s <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&amp;gid=136744&amp;discussionID=11113228&amp;goback=.anh_136744">LTE group</a>. Is LTE really 4G, or is it 3.9 or even 3.8?</p>
<p>Few things triggers more discussion than terms and definition. On one hand, you have a group of professionals that believe that the usage of a term has to be defined strictly in technical terms, and if a technology doesn&#8217;t meet the definition to 100%, it is non-compliant. Don&#8217;t say it is 4G, if it is not compliant to ITU&#8217;s definition, they claim.</p>
<p>The other camp, and I belong to this group, simply say that the new generation of technology is defined by both technical and commercial means. The 4th generation of mobile infrastructure is underway. LTE has a completely new air interface and a completely new core. In practice, the backhaul segment is also re-engineered. This is a huge new investment by mobile operators and the consumers have to buy new handheld devices. A new page in the history book of mobile infrastructure is being turned. I call that 4G.</p>
<p>The debate continues though. You can make your opinion heard here.  Or you can consider contributing to the <a href="  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G ">wikipedia</a> definition of 4G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.xelerated.com/2010/01/08/4g-or-not-4g-that-is-the-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

